Green10 Statement: Axing of waste proposals, uncertainty about air a colossal, strategic blunder | WWF

Green10 Statement: Axing of waste proposals, uncertainty about air a colossal, strategic blunder

Posted on 16 December 2014
The average annual paper use by a typical Brit
© www.shrinkpaper.org
The Green 10 condemn in the strongest possible terms the Commission’s plans to withdraw and retable key proposals on waste management and to create confusion and uncertainty about the fate of the air package. 

Commission President Juncker and his First Vice President Timmermans have announced they are dropping revisions to the EU’s waste targets which would have created 180,000 jobs in Europe. The fate of the National Emissions Ceilings Directive has been kicked into the long grass, with no clarity if negotiations will continue before legislative proposals on climate and energy for 2030 are finalised. The current proposal would have prevented 58,000 early deaths per year and led to health benefits of around €40-140 billion [1].

The decision was taken despite 11 EU countries, including Germany, France, Italy and Spain, urging the Commission not to withdraw either proposal and strong support from some industries and businesses for a revision of the EU’s waste targets.

Ariel Brunner, Birdlife Europe’s Head of EU Policy and current chair of the Green 10, said: “This exercise undermines the Commission’s credibility. In trying to tame some of its critics, the Commission seems to be faithfully executing the ‘kill list’ developed by powerful industry lobby group, BusinessEurope, and then saying it will retable the air quality and waste proposals at a later stage. For a body that prides itself on delivering ‘better regulation’, this is spectacularly inefficient.”

“These proposals offer better health, fewer sick-days, more jobs and a better environment for Europeans, along with a boost for forward-looking industries.”

Ariel Brunner added: “Carrying through this badly thought-out PR exercise will do nothing to restore the EU’s popularity with citizens – it will achieve the opposite. Derailing and creating uncertainty about the efforts to protect the environment and defend outdated and polluting business models represents a colossal, strategic blunder.”

For further information please contact:
Sébastien Pant, EEB Communications Officer for Air Quality and Resource Efficiency, sebastien.pant@eeb.org, +32  4 70 13 47 38

Notes to editors
[1] The external health-related costs to society of air pollution are in the range of €330-940 billion per year.
 
The average annual paper use by a typical Brit
© www.shrinkpaper.org Enlarge