EU’s Fit for 55% package can usher in new era of climate action
Posted on 12 July 2021
It must be in line with science, and have people’s wellbeing and nature at its heart.
What’s happening and why does it matter? Global temperatures are rising, and what we do to reduce emissions in this next decade will decide what our future looks like. If the world does not keep temperature rise to 1.5°C, we will risk facing even more terrifying impacts, from flooding and disease, to drought, pollution, and crop failure.
The EU has a chance this week to propose laws which modernise Europe’s economy, driving it towards climate neutrality in a way that protects people and nature.
In its Fit for 55% package, it will set out a series of proposals for climate and energy laws to show how the whole EU economy will contribute to reaching its 55% net emissions reductions target by 2030.
To get it right, the European Commission’s proposals need to be in line with science - which says a 65% gross emissions cut is needed by 2030 in the EU - and have people’s wellbeing and nature at their heart.
Imke Lübbeke, head of climate and energy at WWF European Policy Office said: “We need laws that will drive rapid emissions reductions and push clean ways of producing and living. But the impacts on people need to be carefully considered too: we have to give everyone a seat on the journey to 2030. Nature also has a part to play through an EU target for 2030 for increased natural carbon removals.
“ If the EU gets Fit for 55% right, it can play a major role in showing other countries what an advanced economy can do. It will set the stage for good international action at this year’s climate summit, COP26, when all countries need to come with stronger climate commitments,” added Lübbeke.
What does WWF want to see? WWF is calling for the package to be aligned with climate science, be socially fair, put nature at the centre, and be implemented in a transparent and effective manner.
In practice, this means the following:
ETS revision The EU ETS needs to be made more effective at decarbonisation by:
Lowering the maximum amount of emissions allowances, to bring it closer to real emissions levels and avoid the creation of a surplus in the 2020s. We support the removal of 350 million emissions allowances from 2023.
Increasing the ETS target for 2030 to 70% emissions reductions in those sectors. The annual reduction in allowances should be 3.6% from 2023.
Reviewing the mechanism set up to withhold extra allowances from the market - the ‘Market Stability Reserve’ . This is crucial to absorb the historical surplus of allowances (and a potential new surplus due to the COVID crisis). We need to take more allowances off the market (at a 24% rate after 2023, not 12% as planned), lower thresholds, and continuously cancelling allowances which are taken off the market.
Auctioning revenues should be invested in the Modernisation and Innovation Funds, to support industry decarbonisation.
Member States should make better use of ETS revenues and spend them on climate action entirely. The ETS directive should include a clear definition of what counts as ‘climate action’, in line with ‘do no significant harm’ criteria and social safeguards.
Member States have to drastically improve the quality and transparency of their ETS reporting, which has been clearly lacking.
The CBAM must be designed and implemented as an alternative to the free allocation of allowances under the ETS. In addition to being double subsidies to industry, it is also unclear and doubtful that both provisions (CBAM and free allocation) would be compatible with WTO rules.
It must ensure fairness and equity, for example by ensuring any revenues are redistributed in a fair way, and avoiding any negative impact on the economies of developing countries.
It must be part of a wider set of policies to enable and promote investment in low carbon industrial processes, energy efficiency measures and renewable energies to achieve the decarbonisation of industry.
Effort sharing regulation revision
The Effort Sharing Regulation and the national binding emissions reduction targets it sets on non-ETS sectors must be maintained and brought in line with the 1.5C target in the Paris Agreement.
The existing offsetting arrangements between the ESR and the land use and forestry sectors (referred to by the Commission as ‘flexibility’) should be scrapped.
Renewable energy directive revision
An increased renewable energy target of at least 50% by 2030
An end to incentives for burning trees and dedicated biofuel or energy crops for energy
The subsidies that Member States currently spend on harmful bioenergy to be redirected to the clean technologies that are part of the climate solution, including wind and solar.
An end to new hydropower plants in the EU, on the grounds that it would make a trivial contribution to cutting GHG emissions but have a huge impact on freshwater biodiversity - see this joint NGO manifesto for further details.
The EU should aim to increase net removals to 600 Mt CO 2 -eq per year, to be met through the rapid expansion of nature restoration and sustainable agricultural and forestry practices that are a win-win for the climate and biodiversity.
The accounting rules for the various different land use categories covered by the LULUCF Regulation must be changed. Right now, these ‘bake-in’ historical levels of emissions and/or harvesting and do not accurately reflect the emissions and removals that are ‘seen’ by the atmosphere.
There should also be clear separation between emissions and removals in the land use sector and emissions in other sectors: net removals in the land use sector are hard to measure and not necessarily stable, so should not be treated as tonne-for-tonne equivalent to fossil fuel emissions, or used to offset and hence delay climate action elsewhere.
Contact: Sarah Azau Media and communications manager, WWF European Policy Office email@example.com Tel: +32 473 573 137
Global Climate Strike in London on Friday 15th March 2019.